Home fry from a nice guy

Tuesday, October 24, 2006

black & white or just plain gray ?

It seems that there are various perspectives on life.

1. black and white
3. blach, white, and gray
2. color

I'm not really sure about the color one, but i know it has to be in there. in the moral color spectrum there is black and white with one being good and the other being bad. of course, if something is in between we consider it gray, with the tone or shade being set by just how close it was to being more good or bad.

i am not sure why we can't use color. i suppose it is because right and wrong are seen as absolutes and have been labeled then on the color or light spectrums as those colors or lights which contain all color or all light or no elements of color or light.

if we used other colors (e.g. red, green, blue, yellow, etc.) on our so called "moral spectrum", then what would the represent. it seems like you would need something besides just right and wrong on the moral spectrum in order to pull the moral point away from the line in between black and white and make it a 3 dimensional model (or 2-d depending on your point of view).

again, what else is there besides right or wrong and everything in between. i mean the other things would have to be completely different wouldn't they? of course, white seems to be encompasment of all light (when discussing the light spectrum), and so it would stand to reason that their would be other things that fall within the moral compass outside of the black and white that could be summed together to give white.

that is there could be other elements which would be represented by a blue or red for instance which when added up would combine to give you right or white.

but what are these other things?

Monday, October 09, 2006

If you could ask God anything, what would it be?

Just an open question I'm throwing out:

If you could ask God anything, what would it be?

Friday, August 25, 2006

What's good without God?

I was sitting in class the other day and the discussion was on how to solve the insurgency problem in the middle east. In truth, it was about how to counter insurgencies - groups that try to disrupt the current state of affairs in a nation and eventually gain some form of control.

We were talking about different ways of working with people and governments in such nations and how to effect their hearts and minds so that the people would feel that their needs were being met and that their government was doing a good job. Some of the ideas had to do with educating the people, others with instilling confidence through military force, and others were about humanitarian assistance.

And then it occurred to me. The answer was simple. What these people needed was the same thing that everyone needs. It's what we are all looking for to meet our needs and yet for some reason we go around in circles trying to find it.

It's Jesus. These people need Jesus just like so many other's do.

At this point I realized that anything we came up with was futile. The best answer we could possibly come up with would be the one that was closest to God.

That's all we were doing - we were trying to think up good things that could be done without God. It's done all the time in our nation and around the world. People recognize goodness; it's hard to miss. We like things that are good. It makes us feel good to know that things are good or can be good. However, what often makes things uncomfortable is recognizing the source of any goodness as being God.

Jesus himself, when called "good teacher", replied saying, "only God is good."

Yet, instead of acknowleding God as good, we try to strip God out of any goodness we come up with or see. It's foolish. And yet we continue, trying our best to solve the world's problems using the things that are of God (i.e., good things such as love, charity, respect, discipline, security, peace, equality) and yet try to make them appear as Godless (I mean without recognition of God) as possible.

So what is good without God? Looking at the letters in "good" and then taking out "God" leaves us with "o". That's right, we are left with nothing, zero, a circle that we go round and around unaware that what we are really looking for is surrounding us on every side.

May you look up from going in circles today and see God's goodness. It is there.

Blessings to you.

Tuesday, August 01, 2006

And then there was light

I was reading Genesis this morning. It's not the first time I have read it, nor will it be the last. Something struck me about it however. God said, "Let there be light". This would imply that before light, there was only darkness. However, if God is light, then how could there have been darkness? Of course, perhaps when we say God is light, we don't mean that God is physical light, but rather the metaphysical light.

besides, it's not like God was living in physical darkness, such a statement would have no meaning, unless of course God had to use the same eye's that we do, which need light in order to see. However, I sincerely doubt that the God of the universe requires eyes like ours in order to see clearly. In which case there would have been no need for physical light. No, that light was for our sake. It was given to us as a gift. However, it was not the only light that was given to us as a gift and nor was it the most important light that was given to us as a gift.

No, the true light that we need to live, not just in this life but for eternity, was Jesus Christ who came and died for our sins so that we might have life and have it abundantly. This is a life that has true light, which sustains us beyond our mere physical bodies.

blessings to you today. may you receive the light of Jesus today and walk in it with Him.

Monday, July 31, 2006

In the beginning

In the beginning there was a random guy working on a master's degree in electrical engineering and another in computer science. what he would use these degrees for remained a mystery to him, but all was not lost. Why?


because this was just the beginning . . .